Academy of American Poets

Search This Blog

Bruce Gendleman Insurance Group

About Bruce Gendelman Insurance Services

Bruce Gendelman established Bruce Gendelman Insurance Services over 30 years ago to provide the utmost care in risk assessment, technical detail, and superior insurance company relationships – all with the purpose of giving clients the best coverage at competitive prices. Today we are proud of the Bruce Gendelman Insurance Services team who work tirelessly to satisfy clients with risk exposures in the United States and overseas. Our commercial and personal advisors ensure each client is afforded a unique and understandable insurance program.

Bruce Gendelman Insurance Services is a privately owned and family run insurance agency with its underwriting center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and staff in Aspen, Bentonville, Birmingham, Boca Raton, Bonita Springs, Chicago, Fort Lauderdale, Houston, Jupiter, Long Island, Los Angeles, Miami, Miami Beach, Milwaukee, Naples, New York, Palm Beach, Palm Beach Gardens, Phoenix, Portland, San Francisco, Tampa, Washington D.C., Wausau and West Palm Beach

index
“Our main concern is to protect the assets of our clients with total confidentiality and privacy.”
Bruce Gendelman

btn-contact

Copyright © 2013 Bruce Gendelman
All rights reserved | Terms of Service

Copelandnetwork

I Love David Trump as President

Louisiana

This article is about the U.S. state of Louisiana. For other uses, see Louisiana (disambiguation).
This article is about the U.S. state abbreviated as LA. For the U.S. city abbreviated as LA, see Los Angeles.
State of Louisiana
Flag of Louisiana State seal of Louisiana
Flag Seal
Nickname(s): Bayou State • Child of the Mississippi
Creole State • Pelican State (official)
Sportsman's Paradise • Sugar State • The Boot
Motto(s): Union, Justice, Confidence
Map of the United States with Louisiana highlighted
Official language English
Spoken languages

As of 2007

Demonym Louisianian
Capital Baton Rouge
Largest city New Orleans[1][2][3]
Largest metro Greater New Orleans
Area Ranked 31st
• Total 51,843 sq mi
(135,382 km2)
• Width 130 miles (210 km)
• Length 379 miles (610 km)
• % water 15
• Latitude 28° 56′ N to 33° 01′ N
• Longitude 88° 49′ W to 94° 03′ W
Population Ranked 25th
• Total 4,670,724 (2015 est)[4]
Density 105/sq mi (40.5/km2)
Ranked 24th
Elevation
• Highest point Driskill Mountain[5][6]
535 ft (163 m)
• Mean 100 ft (30 m)
• Lowest point New Orleans[5][6]
−8 ft (−2.5 m)
Admission to Union April 30, 1812 (18th)
Governor John Bel Edwards (D)
Lieutenant Governor Billy Nungesser (R)
Legislature State Legislature
Upper house State Senate
Lower house House of Representatives
U.S. Senators David Vitter (R)
Bill Cassidy (R)
U.S. House delegation 5 Republicans, 1 Democrat (list)
Time zone Central: UTC −6/−5
ISO 3166 US-LA
Abbreviations LA, La.
Website louisiana.gov
[show]Louisiana state symbols
Louisiana entrance sign off Interstate 20 in Madison Parish east of Tallulah.

Louisiana (Listeni/lˌziˈænə/ or Listeni/ˌlziˈænə/; French: État de Louisiane, [lwizjan]; Louisiana Creole: Léta de la Lwizyàn) is a state located in the southern region of the United States. Louisiana is the 31st most extensive and the 25th most populous of the 50 United States. Its capital is Baton Rouge and largest city is New Orleans. Louisiana is the only state in the U.S. with political subdivisions termed parishes, which are the local government's equivalent to counties. The largest parish by population is East Baton Rouge Parish, and the largest by land area is Plaquemines. Louisiana is bordered by Arkansas to the north, Mississippi to the east, Texas to the west, and the Gulf of Mexico to the south.

Much of the state's lands were formed from sediment washed down the Mississippi River, leaving enormous deltas and vast areas of coastal marsh and swamp.[7] These contain a rich southern biota; typical examples include birds such as ibis and egrets. There are also many species of tree frogs, and fish such as sturgeon and paddlefish. In more elevated areas, fire is a natural process in the landscape, and has produced extensive areas of longleaf pine forest and wet savannas. These support an exceptionally large number of plant species, including many species of orchids and carnivorous plants.[7]

Some Louisiana urban environments have a multicultural, multilingual heritage, being so strongly influenced by a mixture of 18th-century French, Spanish, Native American, and African cultures that they are considered to be exceptional in the US. Before the American purchase of the territory in 1803, the current Louisiana State had been both a French colony and for a brief period, a Spanish one. In addition, colonists imported numerous African slaves as laborers in the 18th century. Many came from peoples of the same region of West Africa, thus concentrating their culture. In the post-Civil War environment, Anglo-Americans increased the pressure for Anglicization, and in 1921, English was made the only official language of the state.[8] Louisiana has more Native American tribes than any other southern state, including four that are federally recognized, ten that are state recognized, and four that have not yet received recognition.[9]

Etymology

Louisiana was named after Louis XIV, King of France from 1643 to 1715. When René-Robert Cavelier, Sieur de La Salle claimed the territory drained by the Mississippi River for France, he named it La Louisiane.[10] The suffix -ana (or -ane) is a Latin suffix that can refer to "information relating to a particular individual, subject, or place." Thus, roughly, Louis + ana carries the idea of "related to Louis." Once part of the French Colo

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Little+Falls,+MN/@45.9954607,-94.3969936,13z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x52b42523547e7c27:0x91efbfd81d5e6c5b?hl=en

Baton Rouge MS

hannah alexander

hannah alexander

Ronald James Lowry. Wordpress.com

Alexander

Alexander

Baton Rouge

alabama state parks

List of Alabama state parks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Alabama state parks)

This list of Alabama state parks covers state parks and reserves in the Alabama park system. The majority are run by the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources.

Current parks

Parks under direct state management
Name County Area Estab-
lished
River / lake /
other
Image Remarks
Blue Springs State Park Barbour 103 acres (42 ha)


Near Clio; swimming in natural spring, camping, picnicking
Buck's Pocket State Park DeKalb, Jackson, Marshall 2,000 acres (810 ha) 1971

Near Grove Oak; scenic vistas, camping, hiking and equestrian trails
Cathedral Caverns State Park Marshall 461 acres (187 ha) 1987
Stalagmites
Located in Grant; cave tours, tent camping
Cheaha State Park Clay, Cleburne 2,799 acres (1,133 ha) 1933
Stone tower
State's highest point; scenic views, hiking, camping
Chewacla State Park Lee 696 acres (282 ha)
Lake Chewacla
Dashing waterfalls
Located in Auburn; fishing, swimming, non-motorized boating, hiking, camping, cabins
DeSoto State Park Cherokee, DeKalb 3,502 acres (1,417 ha)
Little River
Located on Lookout Mountain; camping, lodging, picnicking, hiking and biking trails
Florala State Park Covington 40 acres (16 ha)
Lake Jackson
Boating, fishing, swimming, picnicking, camping
Frank Jackson State Park Covington 2,050 acres (830 ha)
Lake Frank Jackson
Boating, fishing, swimming, picnicking, camping
Gulf State Park Baldwin 6,150 acres (2,490 ha)
Gulf of Mexico
White sands with surf
Fresh and saltwater fishing and swimming, 18-hole golf course, camping
Joe Wheeler State Park Lauderdale, Lawrence 2,550 acres (1,030 ha)
Wheeler Lake
Near Rogersville; lodge, campground, marina, hiking and biking trail, 18-hole golf course
Lake Guntersville State Park Marshall 6,000 acres (2,400 ha)
Guntersville Lake
Resort complex, cottages, campground, 18-hole golf course, hiking, fishing
Lake Lurleen State Park Tuscaloosa 1,675 acres (678 ha)
Lake Lurleen
Boating, fishing, swimming, hiking, biking
Lakepoint Resort State Park Barbour 1,220 acres (490 ha)
Lake Eufala
Convention center, 18-hole golf course, lodge, campground, cabins, cottages, marina, hiking, picnicking
Meaher State Park Baldwin 1,327 acres (537 ha)
Mobile Bay
Nature trails with wetlands boardwalk through the wetlands, boat ramp, fishing pier, picnicking, camping
Monte Sano State Park Madison 2,140 acres (870 ha) 1938

Located in Huntsville; picnicking, hiking, cabins, campground
Oak Mountain State Park Shelby 9,940 acres (4,020 ha)
Double Oak Lake
Alabama Wildlife Center; golf, swimming, hiking, mountain biking, horseback riding, camping, fishing, hunting
Rickwood Caverns State Park Blount 380 acres (150 ha) 1974
Illuminated cave pasage
Cave tours, swimming, picnicking, hiking, camping
Wind Creek State Park Tallapoosa 1,445 acres (585 ha)
Lake Martin
Camping, swimming, boating, fishing, picnicking, hiking, biking

Other parks

Parks under other management or closed
Name County Area Established Management River / lake /
other
Image Remarks
Bladon Springs State Park Choctaw 357 acres (144 ha) 1939 None
Gazebo
Historic spa grounds with mineral springs; closed 2015
Historic Blakeley State Park Baldwin 1,400 acres (570 ha) 1981 Historic Blakeley Authority Tensaw River
Country road
Camping, picnicking, hiking trails
Brierfield Ironworks Historical State Park Bibb 486 acres (197 ha) 1976 Alabama Historic Ironworks Commission
Remnants
Industrial ruins, historic buildings, trails, campsites
Chattahoochee State Park Houston 596 acres (241 ha)
Houston County Irwin's Mill Creek
Fishing, swimming, boating, picnicking, hiking, camping
Chickasaw State Park Marengo 520 acres (210 ha) 1935 None

Closed in 2015
Florala City Park Covington 40 acres (16 ha)
City of Florala Lake Jackson
Lake view
Boating, fishing, swimming, picnicking, camping
Paul M. Grist State Park Dallas 1,080 acres (440 ha) 1930s Dallas County

Swimming, fishing, boating, camping
Roland Cooper State Park Wilcox 236 acres (96 ha) 1969 None William "Bill" Dannelly Reservoir
Closed in 2015
Tannehill Ironworks Historical State Park Tuscaloosa 2,063 acres (835 ha) 1969 Alabama Historic Ironworks Commission
Industrial structure
Preserved industrial sites, museum, crafts cabins, hiking trails

See also

References

External links

Fashion Face

Fashion Face

Promo tions

NEW: NO MINIMUM QUANTITY on Debossed & Color Coated Order Now Custom Wristbands Safe Trust Toll Free: Monday - Friday 8AM-6PM ET 866.460.9411 bands@the-wristband-factory.com Custom Wristbands Custom Wristbands Home Wristband Types Wristband Pricing Sample Gallery 24 Hour Rush Build & Order Online Free Quote Red Ribbon Week Wristbands In stock and ready to ship! Order stock wristbands or design your own Celebrate and promote a drug free lifestyle with our new Red Ribbon Week wristbands. We have three options in stock and ready to ship, and great discounted pricing for customizing your own Red Ribbon Wristbands Visit the link below for more information! View Red Ribbon Week Wristbands Red Ribbon Week Wristbands Custom Wristbands Fast, Easy, Secure Wristband Ordering New Builder Version 2.0 - Order Now! Our new custom wristband builder features the industry's most advanced wristband designer, allowing you to build, preview and order you custom wristbands all through your computer or mobile device. Give it a try on your next wristband order! Design & Order Online Custom Wristbands Red Ribbon Week Wristbands In stock and ready to ship! Order stock wristbands or design your own Celebrate and promote a drug free lifestyle with our new Red Ribbon Week wristbands. We have three options in stock and ready to ship, and great discounted pricing for customizing your own Red Ribbon Wristbands Visit the link below for more information! View Red Ribbon Week Wristbands Red Ribbon Week Wristbands Custom Wristbands Fast, Easy, Secure Wristband Ordering New Builder Version 2.0 - Order Now! Our new custom wristband builder features the industry's most advanced wristband designer, allowing you to build, preview and order you custom wristbands all through your computer or mobile device. Give it a try on your next wristband order! Design & Order Online Custom Wristbands PrevNext Free Fedex Air Shipping Rush Production Available Free Pantone Color Match No Setup or Mold Fees 100% Quality Guarantee Design & Order Online Free Quote & Artwork Proof as low as $0.15ea Debossed Wristbands Debossed Wristbands Sunken in lettering / imprint VIEW INFO as low as $0.15ea Embossed Wristbands Embossed Wristbands Raised lettering / imprint VIEW INFO as low as $0.24ea Color Filled Wristbands Color Filled Wristbands Sunken in & filled with color VIEW INFO as low as $0.27ea Color Coated Wristbands Color Coated Wristbands Engraved dual color band VIEW INFO as low as $0.38ea One Inch Wristbands One Inch Wristbands Our largest wristband VIEW INFO as low as $0.33ea Three Quarter Inch Wristbands 3/4 Inch Wristbands Larger band with more area VIEW INFO as low as $0.21ea Segmented Wristbands Segmented Wristbands Segmeted multi-color band VIEW INFO as low as $0.21ea Swirled Wristbands Swirled Wristbands Swirled multi-color band VIEW INFO as low as $0.17ea Silkscreen Wristbands Silk Screened Wristbands Detailed silkscreen print VIEW INFO as low as $0.39ea Keychain Wristbands Keychain Wristbands Silicone bands in keychain form VIEW INFO as low as $0.20ea Micro Wristbands Micro Wristbands Sleek mini style wristbands VIEW INFO as low as $0.24ea Finger Wristbands Finger Bands New and improved finger bands VIEW INFO Welcome to The Wristband Factory Wristbands you can trust, and service you can count on. A simple but yet effective way to promote and publicize a club, a team, a charity organization or a business. Over the years, the world has witnessed a steady increase in the popularity of customized silicone wristbands throughout the globe. Perhaps fundraisers and marketing groups are mostly to be blamed for that. If you want to get a message out there to promote, protect or celebrate something, or simply to increase people's awareness about a subject you hold in high esteem, then what could be an easier and a more unique way to do this than personalize a silicone wristband that takes your message to people. When marketing using customized silicone wristbands, frankly speaking, the sky is the limit whether we are talking about the promotion of a new product, a publicity stunt or simply a fundraising event. Depending on the clipart and the text you choose to put on your silicone wristband, your marketing can go a long way to promote a wealth of ideas. •Raise Awareness for Charity •Fundraising for Events and Causes •Promote your Band or Art •Remember a Loved One •Celebrate a Birthday or Anniversary •Show Spirit for your Sports Team •Business / Company advertising •Not For Profit Organizations Why Choose Us? Customers continually return to The Wristband Factory because we care. BENEFITS: EVERY CUSTOMER, EVERY TIME •Fully Customizable With no Character Limit Charges •Free Pantone Color Matching on All Orders •High Quality 100% Medical Grade Silicone •Free Fedex Air Shipping on Non-Rush Orders •24 Production Turnaround Available on Select Bands •No Minimum on Debossed and Color-Coated Bands Key Points The Wristband Factory Customer Spotlight Often times, we'll spotlight a customer's awesome work and efforts. View them here. One Sight Customer Spotlight More Options, More Freedom We offer the ability to create a truly unique wristband for your cause. At The Wristband Factory, various customization options are available, from simple one-phrase bands to multi colored swirled wristbands engraved with your unique personalized message. Our wristbands are also available in a range of bright colors, which makes the customized silicone wristbands an effective way to promote or publicize a good cause, a business or a sports team. All of our customized wristbands are also made from 100% pure silicone rubber. The high quality material makes the wristbands extremely durable. Robust, lightweight and washable, our wristbands are really adaptable to just about any type of sporting activity or promotion and all options can be fully customized to your requirements using our state-of-the-art laser engraving machinery or die molding. Please let us know if you have any ideas for wristbands that you don't currently see advertised on our website! From clients of all types and sizes, The Wristband Factory has helped produce wristbands for millions of people Featured Clients "I just wanted to let you know that our purchase of wristbands arrived today and they look fantastic. Thank you so much for all your help, and for getting everything done quickly and efficiently! Also, your customer service is absolutely unparalleled!" West J. Roberts Greatest Generation Foundation View More Testimonials Wristband Styles •Debossed •Embossed •Color Filled •Color Coated •One Inch •3/4 Inch •Segmented •Swirled •Silk Screened •Keychain •Micro Bands •Finger Bands Pricing & Ordering •Wristband Pricing •Free Quote & Art •Order Now - Online! Important Information •Wristband Gallery •Customer Testimonials •Stock Wristband Colors •24 Hour Rush Wristbands •No Minimum Wristbands •The Wristband Factory Blog Awareness & Efforts •Awareness Wristbands •Cancer Awareness •Disaster Relief •Not For Profit Organizations •Red Ribbon Week Social Profiles FacebookTwitterYoutubeSquidoo FlikrPicasaWordpressGoogle Company Profile The Wristband Factory is changing the way you order and raise funds with high quality silicone wristbands. We genuinely care about your cause and our support and art staff will prove it, dedicating time and effort into making sure you're happy with your purchase with us. Thank you for coming by. Contact Information USA Toll Free: 866-460-9411 Fax: 866-841-0416 Email: bands@the-wristband-factory.com Hours: 8AM - 6PM ET Monday - Friday Copyright © 2013 The Wristband Factory - All Rights Reserved - Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions Statement

Popular Posts

Friday, February 26, 2016

The Perfect Mom


Milton, Wisconsin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Milton, Wisconsin
City
Looking north in downtown Milton
Looking north in downtown Milton
Nickname(s): History in Progress
Location in Rock County and the state of Wisconsin.
Location in Rock County and the state of Wisconsin.
Coordinates: 42°46′40″N 88°57′18″WCoordinates: 42°46′40″N 88°57′18″W
Country United States
State Wisconsin
County Rock County
Area[1]
 • Total 3.54 sq mi (9.17 km2)
 • Land 3.53 sq mi (9.14 km2)
 • Water 0.01 sq mi (0.03 km2)
Elevation[2] 889 ft (271 m)
Population (2010)[3]
 • Total 5,546
 • Estimate (2012[4]) 5,549
 • Density 1,571.1/sq mi (606.6/km2)
Time zone Central (CST) (UTC-6)
 • Summer (DST) CDT (UTC-5)
Area code(s) 608
FIPS code 55-52200[5]
GNIS feature ID 1569532[2]
Website www.ci.milton.wi.us
Milton is a city in Rock County, Wisconsin, United States. The population was 5,546 at the 2010 census.

History

The city was formed as a result of the 1967 merger of the villages of Milton and Milton Junction. In November of that year, ballots were cast by 1,093 voters from both villages (Milton: 515 to 47 in favor of the merge; Milton Junction: 322 to 201 in favor of the merge), and the referendum to merge the two was approved by 77%.[6]
Originally named Prairie du Lac, Milton was settled in 1838 by Joseph Goodrich, who built an inn, the Milton House, at the intersection of two trade routes. The Milton House is today one of the oldest poured grout structures in the United States.[7] A noted abolitionist, Goodrich is known to have aided fugitive slaves escape to freedom via the Underground Railroad.
It is believed that Milton is named after poet John Milton, author of "Paradise Lost", after a settler remarked that the town was his "Paradise Regained" after leaving his previous home, which he thought of as a paradise lost.[8]

Geography

Milton is located at 42°46′40″N 88°57′18″W (42.777795, -88.955133).[9]
According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 3.54 square miles (9.17 km2), of which, 3.53 square miles (9.14 km2) is land and 0.01 square miles (0.03 km2) is water.[1]

Demographics

Historical population
Census Pop.
1880 508
1890 685
34.8%
1910 833
1920 834
0.1%
1930 1,128
35.3%
1940 1,266
12.2%
1950 1,549
22.4%
1960 1,671
7.9%
1970 3,699
121.4%
1980 4,092
10.6%
1990 4,434
8.4%
2000 5,132
15.7%
2010 5,546
8.1%
Est. 2014 5,585 [10] 0.7%
U.S. Decennial Census[11]

Sign on WIS 26

2010 census

As of the census[3] of 2010, there were 5,546 people, 2,231 households, and 1,499 families residing in the city. The population density was 1,571.1 inhabitants per square mile (606.6/km2). There were 2,382 housing units at an average density of 674.8 per square mile (260.5/km2). The racial makeup of the city was 96.0% White, 0.5% African American, 0.2% Native American, 1.0% Asian, 1.1% from other races, and 1.1% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 2.4% of the population.
There were 2,231 households of which 35.8% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 49.4% were married couples living together, 11.9% had a female householder with no husband present, 5.9% had a male householder with no wife present, and 32.8% were non-families. 26.8% of all households were made up of individuals and 11% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.48 and the average family size was 2.98.
The median age in the city was 35.8 years. 26.3% of residents were under the age of 18; 7.8% were between the ages of 18 and 24; 28.3% were from 25 to 44; 25.1% were from 45 to 64; and 12.5% were 65 years of age or older. The gender makeup of the city was 49.1% male and 50.9% female.

2000 census

As of the census[5] of 2000, there were 5,132 people, 2,034 households, and 1,383 families residing in the city. The population density was 1,587.8 people per square mile (613.5/km²). There were 2,129 housing units at an average density of 658.7 per square mile (254.5/km²). The racial makeup of the city was 98.07% White, 0.18% Black or African American, 0.14% Native American, 0.31% Asian, 0.49% from other races, and 0.82% from two or more races. 0.92% of the population were Hispanic or Latino of any race.
There were 2,034 households out of which 36.6% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 52.9% were married couples living together, 11.2% had a female householder with no husband present, and 32.0% were non-families. 26.5% of all households were made up of individuals and 10.8% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.51 and the average family size was 3.04.
In the city the population was spread out with 27.6% under the age of 18, 8.6% from 18 to 24, 31.7% from 25 to 44, 20.3% from 45 to 64, and 11.9% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 34 years. For every 100 females there were 96.2 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 90.6 males.
The median income for a household in the city was $43,201, and the median income for a family was $52,384. Males had a median income of $39,392 versus $22,866 for females. The per capita income for the city was $22,058. About 3.3% of families and 6.7% of the population were below the poverty line, including 7.1% of those under age 18 and 13.4% of those age 65 or over.

Economy

 

 

 

Milton is the site of a $70 million ethanol plant built by United Cooperative.[12] A Cargill animal nutrition plant is located in Milton, with a 170-foot (52 m) grain elevator.[13]

Education

Milton Schools include Milton High School, Milton Middle School, Northside Intermediate School, Milton East Elementary, Milton West Elementary, Consolidated Elementary, Harmony School, and Blackhawk Tech which was MECAS (Milton Edgerton Clinton Alternative School).
The former Milton College operated from 1844 to 1982. Milton native, Albert Whitford, a graduate of the college, became a leading astronomer. Another alumnus, Dave Krieg, was an All-Pro quarterback with the Seattle Seahawks.
The city is increasingly tied to Janesville, its larger neighbor to the south, and parts of Janesville are now within the Milton School District as that city expands to the north and east. Students that go to Milton may live in several other districts surrounding Milton such as Janesville and Harmony district.

Notable people

References

  1. "US Gazetteer files 2010". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2012-11-18.
  2. "US Board on Geographic Names". United States Geological Survey. 2007-10-25. Retrieved 2008-01-31.
  3. "American FactFinder". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2012-11-18.
  4. "Population Estimates". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2013-06-24.
  5. "American FactFinder". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved 2008-01-31.
  6. Historic Headlines: From the Files of Milton Newspapers Since 1878. Milton, WI: The Milton Courier, 1989. Print.
  7. http://www.miltonhouse.org/architecture.htm
  8. http://www.ci.milton.wi.us/page.aspx?page_id=27
  9. "US Gazetteer files: 2010, 2000, and 1990". United States Census Bureau. 2011-02-12. Retrieved 2011-04-23.
  10. "Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Incorporated Places: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2014". Retrieved June 4, 2015.
  11. "Census of Population and Housing". Census.gov. Retrieved June 4, 2015.
  12. Janesville Gazette - "Milton plant starts making ethanol "
  13. "Small Town 'Skyscraper'"
  14. 'Wisconsin Blue Book 1887,' Biographical Sketch of James C. Bartholf, pg. 407
  15. 'Wisconsin Blue Book 1921,' Biographical Sketch of Rush Bullis, pg. 268
  16. "Willis Cole Stats". Baseball Almanac. Retrieved January 25, 2014.
  17. Hannan, Caryn (2008). Wisconsin Biographical Dictionary. North American Book Dist LLC.
  18. Siddalleditor-, ed. (1917). Men of Hawaii 1. Honolulu: Honolulu Star-Bulletin. p. 95. |first1= missing |last1= in Authors list (help)
  19. "Term: Manske, John T. 1952". Wisconsin Historical Society. Retrieved January 25, 2014.
  20. 'Wisconsin Blue Book 1933, Biographical Sketch of Alexander Paul, pg. 220
  21. "Catching Up With … Mike Saunders". Hawk Central. Retrieved January 25, 2014.
  22. Industrial Commission (1885). The State of Wisconsin Blue Book. Industrial Commission.
  23. "Jewish WW II Veteran Loses Battle for Medal of Honor". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved January 25, 2014.
  24. "Henry Norris Russell Lectureship". American Astronomical Society. Retrieved January 25, 2014.
  25. "Term: Whitford, William Clarke 1828 - 1902". Wisconsin Historical Society. Retrieved January 25, 2014.

External links


This page w
Aeronautics
Feb. 29, 2016
16-022

NASA Begins Work to Build a Quieter Supersonic Passenger Jet

Artist concept of supersonic aircraft
This is an artist’s concept of a possible Low Boom Flight Demonstration Quiet Supersonic Transport (QueSST) X-plane design. The award of a preliminary design contract is the first step towards the possible return of supersonic passenger travel – but this time quieter and more affordable.
Credits: Lockheed Martin
The return of supersonic passenger air travel is one step closer to reality with NASA's award of a contract for the preliminary design of a “low boom” flight demonstration aircraft. This is the first in a series of ‘X-planes’ in NASA's New Aviation Horizons initiative, introduced in the agency’s Fiscal Year 2017 budget.
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden announced the award at an event Monday at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington, Virginia.
“NASA is working hard to make flight greener, safer and quieter – all while developing aircraft that travel faster, and building an aviation system that operates more efficiently,” said Bolden. “To that end, it’s worth noting that it's been almost 70 years since Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier in the Bell X-1 as part of our predecessor agency's high speed research. Now we’re continuing that supersonic X-plane legacy with this preliminary design award for a quieter supersonic jet with an aim toward passenger flight."
NASA selected a team led by Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company of Palmdale, California, to complete a preliminary design for Quiet Supersonic Technology (QueSST). The work will be conducted under a task order against the Basic and Applied Aerospace Research and Technology (BAART) contract at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia.
After conducting feasibility studies and working to better understand acceptable sound levels across the country, NASA's Commercial Supersonic Technology Project asked industry teams to submit design concepts for a piloted test aircraft that can fly at supersonic speeds, creating a supersonic "heartbeat" -- a soft thump rather than the disruptive boom currently associated with supersonic flight.
“Developing, building and flight testing a quiet supersonic X-plane is the next logical step in our path to enabling the industry's decision to open supersonic travel for the flying public," said Jaiwon Shin, associate administrator for NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission.
Lockheed Martin will receive about $20 million over 17 months for QueSST preliminary design work. The Lockheed Martin team includes subcontractors GE Aviation of Cincinnati and Tri Models Inc. of Huntington Beach, California.
The company will develop baseline aircraft requirements and a preliminary aircraft design, with specifications, and provide supporting documentation for concept formulation and planning. This documentation would be used to prepare for the detailed design, building and testing of the QueSST jet. Performance of this preliminary design also must undergo analytical and wind tunnel validation.
In addition to design and building, this Low Boom Flight Demonstration (LBFD) phase of the project also will include validation of community response to the new, quieter supersonic design. The detailed design and building of the QueSST aircraft, conducted under the NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate's Integrated Aviation Systems Program, will fall under a future contract competition.
NASA’s 10-year New Aviation Horizons initiative has the ambitious goals of reducing fuel use, emissions and noise through innovations in aircraft design that departs from the conventional tube-and-wing aircraft shape.
The New Aviation Horizons X-planes will typically be about half-scale of a production aircraft and likely are to be piloted. Design-and-build will take several years with aircraft starting their flight campaign around 2020, depending on funding.
For more information about NASA’s aeronautics research, visit:
-end-
J.D. Harrington
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-5241
j.d.harrington@nasa.gov
Kathy Barnstorff
Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va.
757-864-9886 / 757-344-8511
kathy.barnstorff@nasa.gov
Last Updated: March 1, 2016
Editor: Sarah Ramsey
Aeronautics
March 1, 2016

New Aviation Horizons Press Conference

NASA Administrator Bolden at podium inside airport making announcement
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden, center, answers questions along with David Melcher, CEO of the Aerospace Industry Association (AIA), left, and Jaiwon Shin, Associate Administrator for NASA's Aerospace Research Mission Directorate, right, during a press conference, Monday, Feb. 29, 2016 at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport in Arlington, Va. Administrator Bolden announced the award of a contract for the preliminary design of a "low boom" flight demonstration aircraft as part of NASA's New Aviation Horizons initiative that was introduced in the agency's Fiscal Year 2017 budget.
Photo Credit: (NASA/Joel Kowsky)
Last Updated: March 1, 2016
Editor: Sarah Loff
Supersonic Flight
Sept. 23, 2015

Ground-Based Schlieren Technique Looks to the Sun and Moon

Schlieren image of shock waves created by a T-38C in supersonic flight.
This schlieren image of a T-38C was captured using the patent-pending BOSCO technique and then processed with NASA-developed code to reveal shock wave structures.
Credits: NASA image
Shock waves created by a supersonic T-38C.
Using the solar disk as a backdrop, its details revealed by a calcium-K optical filter, researchers processed this image to reveal shock waves created by a supersonic T-38C.
Credits: NASA Photo
In the wake of recent success with air-to-air schlieren photography using the speckled desert floor as a background, researchers at NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center, Edwards, California, are now looking to the heavens for backgrounds upon which to capture images of supersonic shock waves using ground-based cameras. A bright light source and/or speckled background – such as the sun or moon – is necessary for visualizing aerodynamic flow phenomena generated by aircraft or other objects passing between the observer’s camera and the backdrop. This patent-pending method, made possible by improved image processing technology, is called Background-Oriented Schlieren using Celestial Objects, or BOSCO.
Flow visualization is one of the fundamental tools of aeronautics research, and schlieren photography has been used for many years to visualize air density gradients caused by aerodynamic flow. Traditionally, this method has required complex and precisely aligned optics as well as a bright light source. Refracted light rays revealed the intensity of air density gradients around the test object, usually a model in a wind tunnel. Capturing schlieren images of a full-scale aircraft in flight was even more challenging due to the need for precise alignment of the plane with the camera and the sun.
Until recently, ground-based schlieren systems, using the sun’s edge as a light source, have produced adequate results, but only two observations of each shockwave could be made as the target aircraft crossed the left and right sides of the sun. Armstrong engineer Edward Haering, originator of the BOSCO concept, noticed that the shockwaves also distorted any visible sunspots. Although the unfiltered solar disk is relatively featureless, astronomers have long known that a calcium-K (CaK) optical filter may be used to reveal the granulated texture of the sun’s chromosphere.
This schlieren image of shock waves created by a T-38C in supersonic flight was captured using the sun’s edge as a light source
This schlieren image of shock waves created by a T-38C in supersonic flight was captured using the sun’s edge as a light source and then processed using NASA-developed code.
Credits: NASA Photo
“Using this naturally speckled background,” said Haering, “we could make hundreds of observations of each shockwave, greatly increasing the acuity of the camera system.”
Researchers at Armstrong and NASA’s Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, California, have developed new schlieren techniques based on modern image processing methods. Shock waves, represented by distortions of the background pattern in a series of images, are accentuated using special mathematical equations. This method requires only simple optics and a featured background, that is one with a speckled appearance such as the cratered lunar surface or the mottled appearance of the sun when viewed through certain filters, such as the CaK filter.
One recent demonstration of this technique was called Calcium-K Eclipse Background Oriented Schlieren (CaKEBOS). According to Armstrong principal investigator Michael Hill, CaKEBOS was a proof of concept test to see how effectively the sun could be used for background oriented schlieren photography.
“Using a celestial object like the sun for a background has a lot of advantages when photographing a flying aircraft,” Hill said. “With the imaging system on the ground, the target aircraft can be at any altitude as long as it is far enough away to be in focus.”
Researchers found the ground-based method to be significantly more economical than air-to-air methods. Merely eliminating requirement for an airborne camera platform reduced operational costs and complexity, as did the use of off-the-shelf equipment.
“The CaKEBOS imaging system was very simple, consisting of consumer grade astronomy equipment we had from previous tests,” said Hill. He further noted, “Someone could probably build a system that would get similar results for around $3000.”
The Air Force Test Pilot School at Edwards provided a supersonic T-38C to serve as a target aircraft. Air Force test pilots Maj. Jonathan Orso and Col. Glenn Graham worked with NASA in planning how to precisely align the jet’s flight path to capture the schlieren images. The aircraft needed to be in the right place at the right time in order to eclipse the sun relative to the imaging system on the ground. The pilots had to hand fly the airplane to hit a specific point in the sky to within approximately 300 feet, while travelling faster than the speed of sound. This had to be accomplished within a two-minute window as the sun’s relative position in the sky changed due to Earth’s rotation.
“We would like to try to use the BOSCO system on things other than aircraft,” Hill said. “We could potentially perform schlieren photography on anything we could get between our camera and the sun.”
The background oriented schlieren technique shows not only supersonic shock waves, but all density changes including wing vortices and engine plume effects. Future research may involve imaging subsonic aircraft flow fields and those generated by wind turbines or vehicles moving along a highway, using an upgraded imaging system to capture higher resolution images.
“Each of these techniques, using the desert floor or the speckled Sun, imaging from the ground or from a nearby aircraft, has its strengths and limitations.  We plan on combining elements of all these to visualize the complex flow patterns on future aircraft that will allow quiet supersonic overland flight for all,” Haering said.
Peter Merlin, Public Affairs
NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center
Last Updated: Sept. 30, 2015
Editor: Yvonne Gibbs
Aeronautics
Sept. 21, 2015

New Wing Shape Tested in Wind Tunnel

Al Bowers and Sue Grafton partnered to complete wind tunnel tests on a Prandtl-d model.
Al Bowers and Sue Grafton partnered to complete wind tunnel tests on a Prandtl-d model.
Credits: Submitted photo courtesy of G. Lee Pollard
Researchers at two NASA aeronautics centers validated elements of a wing design that could greatly improve the efficiency of future aircraft.
NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center on Edwards Air Force Base in California and Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, collaborated on a series of thorough wind tunnel tests that recently took place. Researchers investigated an aircraft aerodynamic wing scheme based on work from the 1930s that features a literal and metaphorical twist on conventional wing calculations.
Al Bowers, NASA Armstrong chief scientist and Preliminary Research Aerodynamic Design to Lower Drag or Prandtl-d, program manager, has been researching the wing configuration with increasingly complex boomerang shaped, subscale aircraft. This summer he worked with groups of NASA Armstrong student interns on a related delta-wing-shaped aircraft with wing design twist principles that could one day lead to a Mars airplane.
The shape chosen for the Langley-developed Prandtl-d wind tunnel model is an amalgamation of the Prandtl-d vehicles flown at NASA Armstrong. A third such vehicle is set to have a first flight later this year.
The wind tunnel data included the unexpected.
Prandtl_wing_6
Al Bowers and the wind tunnel configuration used for researching a model of the Prandtl-d are seen from above.
Credits: Submitted photo courtesy of David C. Bowman
"The wing is very stable and well behaved," Bowers said. "Some of this we knew already, but there were parts that were a little surprising, like how the wing maintains control even when it is completely stalled. These things are hard to know from intuition, it's only having the data in hand that tells us about the real behavior."
The wind tunnel research also added key information.
"The flight data is very limited, but it's the real data," Bowers said. "We can only surmise the aero characteristics in a very piecewise approximate way. The wind tunnel data show all the individual pieces that go into that data set. So we can see the nonlinear behaviors and model those, so the individual pieces can be assembled to the larger characteristics seen in flight. And then comparing the results from the wind tunnel data set to the flight data is the real proof if we've captured the characteristics well or not."
Coupled with the flight data, Bowers said the next step is clear.
"We're going to assemble a simulation database of the wing from this (wind tunnel data)," he said. "Then we will be able to assemble a full six-degree-of-freedom simulation to fly."
No further wind tunnel tests are planned, but some of the next flight tests will capture the aerodynamic pressures over the wing.
"So far we do not have that piece of the puzzle," Bowers said. "We have inferred that we have the correct flow because of the flight behavior of the wing."
The Armstrong and Langley partnership has been in the planning stages for some time. The collaboration took a big step forward earlier this year when Bowers' perseverance resulted in NASA's Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate agreeing to provide funding for Langley to build the wind tunnel model using composite materials, including polycarbonate, and test it in the center's 12-Foot, Low-Speed Wind Tunnel operated by the Flight Dynamics Branch.
Bowers and Langley senior research engineer Sue Grafton previously worked together on such projects as the highly successful F-18 High Alpha Research Vehicle, or HARV. During the nine-year project that investigated a new flight control system at high angles of attack, the two centers compared flight and wind tunnel data. Prandtl-d was an opportunity to partner again.
"It was great working with Langley engineers again," Bowers said. "They are brilliant professionals. We deeply appreciate the support we have from ARMD and Langley in making this happen."
The Prandtl-d makes a test flight in 2014.
The Prandtl-d makes a test flight in 2014.
Credits: NASA / Ken Ulbrich
Based on information from the first two test flight vehicles, Langley engineers designed and built a six-foot-span wind tunnel model, Grafton explained. Some modifications were needed at the center of the wing to accommodate the addition of strain gauges and properly balance the model to accurately collect forces and moments data.
The testing, particularly the smoke portions that illustrated the airflow over the wing, confirmed Bowers' assumptions.
"We have some observations indicating that the wing vortices are not at the wingtips, but are in fact located at about the 70 percent span location," Bowers explained. "In the smoke visualization from the wind tunnel, we could see that outboard (closer to the tips) the smoke would make a "C" shape above the wing, then at the approximate vortex location the smoke had a characteristic "O" shape, and inboard of the 70 percent location we could see the smoke make a reverse "C" shape below the wing. This is consistent with what we believe is happening in the flow from the analysis."
Grafton said she has worked on a number of unique configurations, but not with twist like this wind tunnel model exhibited.
"I don't think I have ever before seen these exact flow patterns that we saw with this test," she said. "How the vortices started and changed, where they went and their makeup. It seemed to look a lot different than the typical airplane wing that I have seen the vortices on before. I had a laser installed (in the wind tunnel) and we could see the flow pattern of the vortices. That tells us why the flow behaves the way it does."
Langley will keep the model should any future questions arise, Grafton said.
"That was an approach on the F-18 HARV program when Al (who was the HARV chief engineer), the Navy or McDonnell Douglas would make a change," she recalled. "They would explain the changes and I would modify the wind tunnel model and test what difference it made."
As the case for the new wing configuration grows with additional flight tests and wind tunnel data, it could be that future aircraft wings might benefit from a twist.
Jay Levine, X-Press editor
NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center
Last Updated: Sept. 23, 2015
Editor: Yvonne Gibbs
Aeronautics Virginia Tech's Gobble Hawk UAS
July 9, 2014
14-190

NASA Announces Winners of Challenge to Design Hurricane-Tracking Uncrewed Aerial Systems

NASA has selected three winning designs solicited to address the technological limitations of the uncrewed aerial systems (UAS) currently used to track and collect data on hurricanes.
Engineering teams at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, and the University of Virginia (UVA) in Charlottesville were named first- through third-place winners, respectively, of the agency’s 2013-2014 University Aeronautics Engineering Design Challenge.
This year’s challenge called on university students, with faculty advisors, to design a new UAS that can exceed the flight limitations of systems currently used to track and gather data on hurricanes throughout the Atlantic Ocean storm season, which runs June 1 to Nov. 30.
“The data gathered by UAS’s is crucial to refining computer models so we can better predict not just the path of these storms, but also the process of hurricane formation and growth,” explained Craig Nickol, a NASA aerospace engineer and technical lead for the contest at the agency's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia. “This is where current systems fall short.”
14-190-2a.jpg
Taking second place, the team at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana, designed the OQ451-5 Trident, a hydrogen-powered UAS capable of seven days of uninterrupted flight.
Credits: Purdue University
Accurate predictions of storm formation and growth require several days of uninterrupted observations and measurements. However, systems now in use to gather storm data, similar to the Global Hawk UAS, have a limited flight endurance of 24 hours per takeoff. Among other stringent criteria, papers submitted for the challenge had to successfully demonstrate how the team’s system design would provide persistent five-month aerial coverage over an area of the Atlantic Ocean off the west coast of Africa where tropical depressions can form into hurricanes. Through this five-month period, systems must be capable of flying non-stop a minimum of seven days.
"The decision process and supporting detail, including cost optimization, were strengths of the top papers," said aerospace engineer Jason Welstead, a contest reviewer for NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate in Washington.
14-190-3a.jpg
The team at the University of Virginia (UVA) in Charlottesville secured third place with its submission, an aircraft dubbed The Big WAHOO, which has a flight endurance of 7.5 days.
Credits: University of Virginia
Virginia Tech’s team of nine university seniors won first place with its Gobble Hawk, an aerial system consisting of two aircraft, each with a flight endurance of 7.8 days and using liquid hydrogen as a fuel source. The team estimated the total cost of the system at $199.5 million for production plus 10 years of operation and maintenance.
Taking second place, Purdue’s OQ451-5 Trident is a hydrogen-powered UAS capable of seven days of uninterrupted flight over the monitoring area. Its approximate costs include $310 million for design, $78 million for production and operating costs of about $17,000 per flight hour.
UVA captured third place with its submission, an aircraft dubbed The Big WAHOO – a hat-tip to the school’s unofficial nickname and also an acronym for Worldwide Autonomous Hurricane and Oceanic Observer – has a flight endurance of 7.5 days. The team estimated the operating life of the aircraft to be 15 years, with a total lifecycle cost of about $493.7 million.
For more than a decade, NASA’s unique University Aeronautics Engineering Design Challenge has inspired senior-level engineering students to develop innovative and cost-effective solutions to real problems faced by the global aeronautics community. Eight university teams submitted final entries for the 2014 challenge. The three winning teams will receive a cash award through an education grant and cooperative agreement with Christopher Newport University in Newport News, Virginia.
For more information on NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate design challenges and competitions, go to:
-end-
Karen Northon
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1540
karen.m.northon@nasa.gov
Last Updated: July 30, 2015
Editor: Karen Northon
Supersonic Flight NASA F/A-18 mission support aircraft
June 17, 2014
14-170

NASA Aeronautics Makes Strides to Bring Back Supersonic Passenger Travel

The return of supersonic passenger travel may be coming closer to reality thanks to NASA’s efforts to define a new standard for low sonic booms.
Several NASA aeronautics researchers will present their work in Atlanta this week at Aviation 2014, an annual event of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. They will share with the global aviation community the progress they are making in overcoming some of the biggest hurdles to supersonic passenger travel.
The research generates data crucial for developing a low-boom standard for the civil aviation industry. NASA works closely with the Federal Aviation Administration and the international aerospace community, including the International Civil Aviation Organization, to gather data and develop new procedures and requirements that may help in a reconsideration of the current ban on supersonic flight over land.
"Lessening sonic booms -- shock waves caused by an aircraft flying faster than the speed of sound -- is the most significant hurdle to reintroducing commercial supersonic flight," said Peter Coen, head of the High Speed Project in NASA's Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate at the agency's Headquarters in Washington. "Other barriers include high altitude emissions, fuel efficiency and community noise around airports."
Engineers at NASA centers in California, Ohio and Virginia that conduct aviation research are tackling sonic booms from a number of angles, including how to design a low-boom aircraft and characterize the noise. NASA researchers have studied how to quantify the loudness and annoyance of the boom by asking people to listen to the sounds in a specially designed noise test chamber.
A recent flight research campaign at NASA's Armstrong Flight Research Center in Edwards, California, had residents explore ways to assess the public’s response to sonic booms in a real-world setting. Researchers at Armstrong have an advantage -- pilots are permitted to fly at supersonic speeds because the facility is located on Edwards Air Force Base.
"People here are more familiar with sonic booms," said Armstrong aerospace engineer Larry Cliatt. "Eventually, we want to take this to a broader level of people who have never heard a sonic boom."
Similar work is conducted at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Virginia, where volunteers from the local community rated sonic booms according to how disruptive they determined the sound to be.
"They each listened to a total of 140 sounds, and based on their average response, we can begin to estimate the general public's reactions," explained Langley acoustics engineer Alexandra Loubeau.
She also conducted a study at Langley comparing results from tools used to predict sonic boom noise at ground-level.
“Because of the interaction with the atmosphere, it is important to be as consistent as possible in the implementation and usage of these tools. The comparisons done so far have shown good agreement, but there are some inconsistencies that need to be studied,” Loubeau said.
Other studies are focused on predicting the sonic boom and on design approaches to reducing it. Participants from Japan, the United States and France attended the first Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop, where they evaluated simple configurations -- cylindrical bodies with and without wings -- and complex full aircraft designs.
"We are working to understand the worldwide state of the art in predicting sonic booms from an aircraft point of view," said Mike Park, a fluid mechanics engineer at Langley. "We found for simple configurations we can analyze and predict sonic booms extremely well. For complex configurations we still have some work to do."
Wind tunnels are another tool used to help predict which airplane designs might have quieter booms. The most recent tests were conducted at NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California, and Glenn Research Center in Cleveland.  Similar to designs of the past, current aircraft designs being tested are characterized by a needle-like nose, a sleek fuselage and a delta wing or highly-swept wings -- shapes that result in much lower booms.
NASA and industry engineers say they believe supersonic research has progressed to the point where the design of a practical low-boom supersonic jet is within reach.
For more information on NASA’s Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, go to:
To learn more about NASA’s supersonic flight research, go to:
For a schedule, and to watch NASA experts present their latest research findings live at Aviation 2014, visit:
-end-
Karen Northon
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1540
karen.m.northon@nasa.gov
Last Updated: July 30, 2015
Editor: Karen Northon
Aeronautics
June 10, 2014
14-163

Actor Seth Green Shows How NASA is With You in the Air and on the Road

NASA technology makes deep space travel happen, but it also improves long distance travel here on Earth.
Actor, creator, producer and writer Seth Green talks about how there is more space in your life than you might think in a new video released on the agency’s website, NASA TV and YouTube channel. The video can be viewed at:
Two of the technologies highlighted – winglets and improved design for car seats – are featured in the agency’s Spinoff 2013 book.
“NASA technologies improve our everyday lives, including providing us with safer, cleaner modes of transportation, supporting millions of passengers and packages traveling by air and ground everyday with efficiencies, comfort and safety,” said Daniel Lockney, NASA’s Technology Transfer Program executive. “The program works to bring the cutting-edge technologies developed for NASA missions down to Earth.”
NASA’s Technology Transfer Program is charged with finding the widest possible applications of agency technology. Through partnerships and licensing agreements with industry, the program ensures that NASA’s investments in pioneering research find secondary applications that benefit the economy, create jobs and improve quality of life.
Hundreds of examples of NASA spinoff technologies appear on NASA’s Spinoff website at:
-end-
Sarah Ramsey
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1694
sarah.ramsey@nasa.gov
Last Updated: July 30, 2015
Editor: Karen Northon
Supersonic Flight Quieting the Boom, The Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstrator and the Quest for Quiet Supersonic Flight book cover.
Nov. 6, 2013

NASA's Sonic Boom Research Takes "Shape"

quieting_the_boom-cover.jpg
This book tells the story of a strangely shaped aircraft that proved to researchers it was possible to lower the volume of sonic booms.
Credits: NASA / Mike Ryan
If an airplane flies overhead at supersonic speed and no one below can hear it, did it make a sonic boom?
735443main_10_f-5e_shaped_sonic_boom_demo_2474x1856_full.jpg
This modified Northrop F-5E jet was used during 2003 for NASA's Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration program, a successful effort to show that an aircraft's shape can be used to reduce the intensity of the sonic booms it creates while flying supersonic.
Credits: NASA
Answering that twist on the classic falling tree in the forest question gets to the heart of a new book published by NASA that explores the agency's research into understanding how sonic booms work and how best to make them less of a public nuisance.
ssbd_mic_ec04-0010-02_full.jpg
One of many microphones arrayed under the path of the F-5E SSBE (Shaped Sonic Boom Experiment) aircraft to record sonic booms.
Credits: NASA / Tony Landis
"Quieting the Boom: The Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstrator and the Quest for Quiet Supersonic Flight" is available online at no cost as an e-book, while printed versions of the book may be purchased from NASA's Information Center.
ssbd_three-up_ec03-0229-6_full.jpg
The modified F-5E Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstration aircraft (center) flies off the wing of NASA's F-15B Research testbed aircraft, which flew in the supersonic shockwave of the F-5E. Following the two aircraft is an unmodified U.S. Navy F-5E used for baseline sonic boom measurements.
Credits: NASA / Carla Thomas
The 388-page book written by Lawrence R. Benson begins with an overview of early supersonic flight that triggered the first sonic booms and sets the stage for telling the story of the Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstrator research aircraft, which is the primary focus of the book.
nasa_supersonic_concept.png
Nearly ten years after SSBD, aircraft shapes that can reduce the level of sonic booms tend to look more like this. This overland supersonic aircraft concept is being used by NASA researchers in computer simulations and to create models for wind tunnel tests.
Credits: NASA
"I think 'Quieting the Boom' shows the value of sustaining basic and applied research to solve difficult scientific and engineering challenges, even if success takes decades to achieve," Benson said.
During the 1950s and into the 1960s, sonic booms were echoing across the nation as the Air Force deployed more and more of the Mach-1-busting jets that were designed to keep the peace during the Cold War.
But the public voice protesting the noise was just as forceful as the sonic booms themselves.
In fact, as Benson points out in the book, between 1956 and 1968 there were 38,831 claims against the Air Force (14,006 were approved) to cover losses from sonic booms that ranged from broken glass and cracked plaster to assertions of pets dying and livestock going insane.
It was within this difficult environment that NASA and the Federal Aviation Administration led a research effort in support of industry designing and building a commercial supersonic transport, which became known as the SST.
However, even as NASA continued to research sonic booms in support of the SST the public and political pressure became too much. The SST program was cancelled in 1971 and the future for supersonic airliners, business jets and other aircraft became gloomy at best.
Fortunately, the nation's aeronautical innovators were not deterred. They believed that with additional research a way could be found to quiet the booms enough to satisfy all critics and make commercial supersonic travel possible across the country.
To help them find that solution, NASA partnered with others to conduct an innovative flight research program using what was named the Shaped Sonic Boom Demonstrator (SSBD), a Northrop Grumman F-5E Tiger fighter jet modified with a larger nose.
"This modification, which made the front of the F-5E somewhat resemble a pelican's beak, was carefully shaped to change the pattern of shock waves it would generate while flying faster than the speed of sound," Benson said.
The theory behind the nose job was that the increased airplane volume at the front of the SSBD would result in less intense sonic booms heard or felt on the ground below.
During a series of some 30 tests flown in August 2003 and January 2004, data gathered by airborne and ground sensors of the SSBD in flight proved the theory was – well – sound, and that additional research in the future could enable the long-sought realization of commercial supersonic flight across the United States.
Indeed, that research continues as NASA and its research partners explore fresh ideas and design new tools for making supersonic flight quieter.
Most importantly, in telling what could easily be a complex story involving high speed flight, atmospheric sciences, acoustics and bizarre math, Benson said he attempted to keep the technical jargon to a minimum.
"This book is intended to be a general history of sonic boom research, emphasizing the people and organizations that have contributed, and not a technical study of the science and engineering involved," Benson said.
The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics has recognized the book with its prestigious History Manuscript Award for 2014.
Publication of "Quieting the Boom" was sponsored and funded by the communications and education department of NASA's Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate.
"Quieting the Boom" E-Book

NASA Information Center
(scroll down to "Aeronautical Publications Available for Purchase")


View Supersonic Aircraft Image Gallery

Read About NASA's Current Sonic Boom Research
Jim Banke
Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate
Last Updated: July 30, 2015
Editor: Lillian Gipson
Aeronautics NASA's AirSTAR team has successfully demonstrated computer software and control systems.
July 23, 2013

AirSTAR: For the Sake of Pilots and Passengers

Loss-of-Control (LOC) occurs when an aircraft departs from normal flight. It is the leading accident category for aircraft fatalities in the commercial fleet.
The remotely-piloted Airborne Subscale Transport Aircraft Research (AirSTAR) generic transport model demonstrates software and control systems that may some day make airliners safer.
Credits: NASA
“Yet, flight experiments with transport aircraft are rarely conducted on conditions present in LOC accidents,” said David Cox, element lead for subscale testing at NASA’s Langley Research Center.
For Cox and the rest of the AirSTAR (Airborne Subscale Transport Aircraft Research) team, the potential to save lives was perfect motivation to fill in those data gaps and better understand flight dynamics in LOC scenarios.
For two years, in 2010 and 2011, 58 research flights took place supporting four modeling studies and the evaluation of 10 different control laws.  The modeling studies help to understand LOC conditions so that future airline pilots can receive better training under these conditions. The control laws offer the potential for future automated safety systems.  The AirSTAR team did these modeling and control experiments on a scaled-down transport aircraft, which reflected actual aircraft dynamics, but was remotely piloted from the ground.
Today, that data is still being researched, published, and used to apply different techniques in the development of enhanced flight models and for the development of advanced control systems.
Using system identification and modeling in extreme conditions can help prepare airline pilots for the worst.
david_cox_1.jpg
David Cox, element lead for subscale testing at NASA’s Langley Research Center, provides an update on AirSTAR during a AIAA ((American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) talk.
Credits: NASA/Dave Bowman
“How do we accommodate failure?” Cox asked the audience during his AIAA (American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics) update on AirSTAR.  “A lot of LOC accidents have traced back the root cause as some sub-system failure that caused the plane to not respond in a normal way and led to it being out of control.”
But control laws were able to fully compensate for some failures, restoring nominal performance to the vehicle.   To produce more aggressive failures that could further test the control laws, they incorporated latency, or a measure of time delay experienced in a system.
“Latency to control laws is like kryptonite to Superman,” Cox said.
An assessment of all controllers that were evaluated in the research indicated that adaptive controllers had improved handling qualities under failure conditions and that all controllers had substantial improvement over open-loop response to failures.
AirSTAR is currently in the fifth phase of development. The team is preparing to operate vehicles beyond the visual range of a spotter or safety pilot.  The systems being developed for Beyond Visual Range (BVR) flight will result in longer test periods, failure detection beyond the inner-loop (the rates and attitude of vehicle) and extended altitudes for deep stall and spins.
New instrumentation includes on-board computers for control and guidance, increased ranges for communication and flight termination, and improved AGL (Above Ground Level) sensing and video for remote piloted landings.
airstar.jpg
NASA's AirSTAR team has successfully demonstrated computer software and control systems that may some day prevent airliners from going into steep dives and other extreme conditions.
Credits: NASA/Sean Smith
Initial flight tests have begun on the BVR System Integration Vehicle, the BAT4, which has multiple cameras for landing evaluations, a laser altimeter for accurate levels and an Inertial Navigation System, which provides attitude, GPS positions, rates and accelerations.  Another checkout vehicle, NASA Langley’s SR22, has also been used to complete testing on telemetry transmitter ranges and sensitivities.  Finally a modular research vehicle, configured as a generic T-tail transport aircraft, is being developed under contract by AREA-I and is expected by summer of 2014.
According to Cox, the tests provide a different set of qualitative and quantitative data that you can’t get from a wind tunnel.
“For aviation safety we’re focused on testing jet transport aircraft, which is what you get on when you go and buy a ticket” Cox said. “The upcoming T-tail model will be representative of a regional jet class vehicle, and we expect a different type of response to LOC flight conditions than that seen using our previous research vehicle that had a conventional tail.”
Flying beyond visual range will allow a deeper understanding into uncontrolled flight conditions.  And for the AirSTAR team, that deeper understanding fuels the need to progress through the fifth and final phase of development.

Denise Lineberry
NASA Langley Research Center
Last Updated: Dec. 2, 2015
Editor: Denise Lineberry
Tags:  Aeronautics
NASA Armstrong Supersonic Laminar Flow Tests Continue on NASA's F-15B
May 22, 2013

Supersonic Laminar Flow Tests Continue on NASA's F-15B

ED13-0108-13_672.jpg
NASA Dryden’s F-15B Research Test bed roars aloft from the Edwards AFB main runway for an SBLT-II mission.
Credits: NASA / Tom Tschida
ED13-0087-06_226.jpg
Dryden electronics technician Chris Brooke of Computer Science Corp. prepares the SBLT-II experiment hung underneath NASA's F-15B for flight test.
Credits: NASA / Tom Tschida
NASA Dryden Flight Research Center’s F-15B Research Testbed aircraft has been busy this spring, flying an experimental test fixture in partnership with Aerion Corporation of Reno, Nevada.

Called the Supersonic Boundary Layer Transition, Phase II, or SBLT-II, the experiment consists of flying a small test airfoil, or wing section, attached underneath the F-15B. This allows NASA and Aerion engineers to continue investigating the extent and robustness of natural laminar flow over the test section at supersonic speeds.
Conducting the experiment in actual supersonic flight conditions with the F-15B enables engineers to capture data in a real-world flight environment, allowing for more precise refining of supersonic natural laminar flow airfoil design.

“The objective of the flight series is to investigate the extent and robustness of smooth, or laminar, airflow over the specially-designed test airfoil,” said Brett Pauer, NASA Dryden’s deputy High Speed Project manager. “Then, researchers will work to better understand when imperfections in the airfoil’s surface cause the air to transition from laminar to rough, turbulent flow. The greater the extent of laminar airflow over a wing, the less aerodynamic drag there is, which reduces fuel consumption,” Pauer said.

It is believed that significant laminar flow has never been achieved on any production supersonic aircraft before, so this research and the data being collected from the SBLT-II test fixture may help provide some of the data that might enable the design of supersonic aircraft in the future that have wings that produce laminar flow at supersonic cruise conditions.

One of the goals of NASA’s High Speed Project, which utilizes the F-15B and other high performance jets, is reducing the fuel consumption and increasing efficiency of future supersonic aircraft.

Project flights of the SBLT-II experiment began on the F-15B earlier this year. So far, four data-gathering flights have been flown, with six more planned.
› View Video
Gray Creech
NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: NASA Administrator
Aeronautics
May 12, 2013

NASA Researchers Sniff Out Alternate Fuel Future

dscn0215_original.jpg
Puffy white exhaust contrails stream from the engines of NASA's DC-8 flying laboratory in this photo taken from an HU-25 Falcon flying in trail about 300 feet behind.
Credits: NASA/Eddie Winstead
At times the view outside the cockpit window of the NASA Falcon HU-25 jet was nothing short of incredible.
ed13-0058-03_original.jpg
A heavily instrumented HU-25 Falcon measures chemical components from the larger DC-8's exhaust generated by a 50/50 mix of conventional JP8 and a plant-derived biofuel.
Credits: NASA/Lori Losey
Up ahead, about a football field length's distance away, the agency's DC-8 appeared to loom large in the windscreen, its four engines belching out exhaust and forming icy contrails that would stretch for miles over the California high desert before dissipating.
HU25CGuardian2_original.jpg
The "sniffer" plane – the HU-25 Guardian, or "Falcon" – is based at NASA's Langley Research Center.
Credits: NASA
"You don't normally fly this close behind an aircraft like that, but it was for a good reason," said Bruce Anderson, a senior research scientist at NASA's Langley Research Center in Virginia.
ED13-0058-02_original.jpg
The modified HU-25 Falcon probes the exhaust contrails from NASA's DC-8 flying laboratory as both aircraft enter a turn at about 35,000 feet altitude during the first data-collection flight in restricted test airspace over California's high desert.
Credits: NASA/Lori Losey
dscn0160_original.jpg
During an early test flight, researchers in the HU-25 had this view of the exhaust plume from 15 kilometers behind the DC-8.
Credits: NASA
That reason is a NASA project to study the effects that burning an alternate biofuel has on engine performance, emissions and aircraft-generated contrails at altitude. The hope is that using alternate biofuels will be a safe and effective way to reduce aviation's impact on the environment.
To help make that determination NASA's aeronautical innovators recently took to the sky using the workhorse DC-8 and newer Falcon jet for some formation flying in which the distances between the two aircraft varied between 300 feet and ten miles.
In front was the DC-8, its tanks filled with either conventional JP-8 jet fuel, or a 50-50 blend of JP-8 and an alternative fuel of hydroprocessed esters and fatty acids that comes from camelina plants.
"Flower power is the way some of us like to describe this kind of alternate fuel," Anderson said.
Either of the fuels, pure or blended, could be burned in any combination of the DC-8's four, wing-mounted CFM56 jet engines at any time with just the throw of a few switches by the pilots.
Flying behind was the Falcon jet, modified to carry a suite of some 20 scientific and navigation-related instruments that were designed to sniff out and record 20 different parameters of the exhaust coming from the DC-8 at various distances, altitudes and engine power settings.
During the month-long flight campaign that began Feb. 28, researchers recorded more than 15 hours of emissions sampling at cruise altitudes, and another almost four hours of sampling on the ground with the Falcon and an instrumented mobile laboratory parked behind the DC-8 as they sat on the airport tarmac.
"There were a few things that surprised us, but I think it went very well," Anderson said. "All in all we developed a very effective method for sampling the exhaust behind the DC-8."
Darting in and out of the DC-8's wake, the ride inside the Falcon was, to put it mildly, a little bumpier than what typical airline passenger might experience. Keeping your seatbelts fastened at all times was more than just a good idea.
"It was kind of like riding down a washboard-rutted dirt road when we were in the exhaust," said Anderson, who participated in all of the research flights aboard the Falcon. "We didn't get into any real exciting turbulence, though. These planes are very tough and I never was concerned that we were doing anything unsafe."
The Alternative Fuel Effects on Contrails and Cruise Emissions (ACCESS) flights were staged from NASA's Dryden Aircraft Operations Facility in Palmdale, Calif., and mostly took place within restricted airspace high over Edwards Air Force Base, Calif.
ACCESS follows a pair of Alternative Aviation Fuel Experiment studies conducted in 2009 and 2011 in which ground-based instruments measured the DC-8's exhaust emissions as the aircraft burned alternative fuels while remaining parked on the ramp at the Palmdale facility.
The idea behind ACCESS was to continue that research in the air, with the aim of this first phase of flights intended to learn the best ways to conduct the emissions sampling using the combination of the DC-8 and Falcon jets. A second phase, likely to take place later this year or in 2014, will focus on adding to the scientific research data obtained during the initial ACCESS experiment.
"Right now we are going through our data set. We are picking out individual exhaust plumes, analyzing the particle measurements, gas measurements and ice particle measurements," Anderson said. "And we'll have that data set for both the JP-8 and for the blended fuel."
It's too early to report any conclusive results from the tests, but a quick look at the data seems to indicate that the alternate fuel blend reduces black carbon emissions by more than 30 percent on the ground, with less obvious results in the air, including the alternate fuel's effect on contrail formation.
"We don't know if the emissions have any impact on ice particle formation. That's something that will probably be buried in the statistics, and we'll be examining that," Anderson said.
As researchers continue to pour over the scientific data and begin to prepare technical papers for public release, ACCESS's project managers are already looking ahead and beginning to think about what the next phase will look like and when it might fly. "We would like to have more instruments," Anderson said. "I think everything we had on the plane works well. I can't think of anything I'd want to leave at home, but I'd like to carry more and that's going to be difficult because we pretty much had this plane loaded to the gills."
The ACCESS study is a joint project involving researchers at Dryden, Langley and NASA's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland. The Fixed Wing Project within the Fundamental Aeronautics Program of NASA's Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate manages ACCESS.
Jim Banke
NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate
Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: Lillian Gipson
Supersonic Flight
May 9, 2013

Updated Supersonic

This updated future aircraft design concept from NASA research partner Lockheed Martin shows a few changes from another concept
This updated future aircraft design concept from NASA research partner Lockheed Martin shows a few changes from another concept seen eight images earlier in this gallery. It is a good example of how simulations and wind tunnel tests, conducted over time, generate data that tell researchers how to improve a design to achieve goals. The goals for a future supersonic aircraft are to produce a much lower-level sonic boom and to reduce emissions. The ultimate goal is to achieve a low enough boom that a current ruling prohibiting supersonic flight over land might be lifted.

Image credit: NASA/Lockheed Martin
Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: Lillian Gipson
Aeronautics
March 23, 2013

Breaking the Barrier

Bell X-1 rocket plane in flight.
The Bell X-1 rocket plane was the first to break the supposed sound barrier (or Mach 1) on Oct. 14, 1947. Air Force Capt. Chuck Yeager was at the controls as the X-1 was flown over what is now called Edwards Air Force Base. The high-speed experimental flight program was a joint effort of the Air Force and the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, the predecessor of NASA, and opened the door for all the supersonic research to come.

Read More

Image Credit: NASA
Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: Lillian Gipson
Aeronautics
March 22, 2013

Let's Twist Again

The X-53 was a modified F/A-18 fighter used for a joint Air Force, Boeing and NASA project, Active Aeroelastic Wing (AAW).
The X-53 was a modified F/A-18 fighter used for a joint Air Force, Boeing and NASA project called the Active Aeroelastic Wing (AAW), which flew between 2002 and 2005. Taking a cue from the Wright Brother's original airplane, which used wing warping to help steer, the basic idea of the AAW was to direct computer-managed control surfaces into the slipstream to effectively twist the wing into different shapes in hope of improving the aircraft's handling characteristics at various speeds, including supersonic.

Read More

Image Credit: NASA
Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: Lillian Gipson
Aeronautics
March 22, 2013

Pushing the Envelope

Bell X-2 Starbuster in flight.
With Mach 1 and Mach 2 behind them, NACA engineers sought to expand on their research to fully understand the problems associated with flying at supersonic speeds. The next milestone was Mach 3, and the rocket powered Bell X-2 Starbuster hit that mark on Sept 27, 1956. Unfortunately there was a problem as the aircraft turned back toward Edwards Air Force Base and began tumbling out of control. The pilot, Capt. Milburn "Mel" Apt, did not survive.

Read More

Image Credit: NASA
Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: Lillian Gipson
Supersonic Flight
Feb. 14, 2013

NASA's Low-Boom Supersonic Test Case

This concept of an aircraft that could fly at supersonic speeds over land.
This concept of an aircraft that could fly at supersonic speeds over land is being used by researchers, especially at NASA's Langley Research Center, to continue to test ideas on ways to reduce the level of sonic booms. Its technologies – the F-100-like propulsion system, a tail blister, and the overall shape – are combined to achieve a lower target perceived decibel level.

Aeronautics researchers continue to tweak, modify and test concepts like these to develop and validate tools that could someday be used by industry to design commercial supersonic aircraft.

Image credit: NASA
Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: Lillian Gipson
Supersonic Flight
Oct. 17, 2012

Model Points to Fast Future

Symmetrical front view of silver aircraft model in blue wind tunnel
If human beings are ever to fly faster than the speed of sound from one side of the country to another, we first have to figure out how to reduce the level of sonic boom generated by supersonic flight.

Earlier this fall, a subscale model of a potential future low-boom supersonic aircraft designed by The Boeing Company was installed for testing in the supersonic wind tunnel at NASA's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland.

This model is a larger of two models used in the test. The model contains a force measurement balance used to capture force measurements (lift, drag). Depending on the type of test and on the tunnel, the model can be oriented any way. Pictured here, the model is actually upside down.

Another smaller model was used to capture measurements of the off-body pressures that create a sonic boom.

The tests are among those being conducted by NASA and its partners to identify technologies and designs to achieve a level of sonic boom so low that it barely registers on buildings and people below.

Image Credit: NASA/Michelle M. Murphy
Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: NASA Administrator
Supersonic Flight Tests of scale models like this one in a supersonic wind tunnel at NASA's Ames Research Center.
May 8, 2012

Sonic Boom Heads for a Thump

acd11-0057-023.jpg
Tests of scale models like this one in a supersonic wind tunnel at NASA's Ames Research Center help researchers understand the forces acting on the aircraft that create sonic booms.
Credits: NASA / Dominic Hart
NASA's aeronautical innovators are one step closer to confidently crafting a viable commercial airliner that can fly faster than the speed of sound, yet produce a sonic boom that is quiet enough not to bother anyone on the ground below.
453799main_boeing_supers_original_full.jpg
This design for a possible future aircraft that could fly at supersonic speed over land came from a team led The Boeing Company and funded by a NASA Research Announcement. Other team members included Boeing Phantom Works, GE Global Research, Georgia Tech, M4 Engineering, Pratt &Whitney, Rolls Royce and Wyle Laboratories.
Credits: NASA / The Boeing Company
The key to this recent advance came when wind tunnel tests of scale model airplanes verified that new approaches to designing such aircraft would work as hoped for when aided by improved computer tools, which were used for the first time together in each step of the design process.
b2_render5000x3651_full.jpg
Lockheed Martin led the team that developed this design for a possible future aircraft that can fly at supersonic speed over land. Funded by a NASA Research Announcement, the team also included GE Global Research, Purdue University and Wyle Laboratories.
Credits: NASA / Lockheed Martin
"That was really the breakthrough for us. Not only that the tools worked, but that our tests show we could do even better in terms of reducing noise than we thought at the start of the effort," said Peter Coen, NASA's supersonic project manager at Langley Research Center in Virginia.

ed11-0339-012.jpg
NASA personnel install a sonic boom sensor in a residential community for tests last year that remotely measured sonic boom levels. The data is helping researchers determine an acceptable level for sonic booms heard over land.
Credits: NASA / Tom Tschida
Nuisance noise generated by a commercial supersonic jet's sonic booms during cruise, and by its powerful engines at takeoff and landing, has kept the speedy aircraft from entering service in the United States – except for Europe's Concorde, which was limited to trans-Atlantic flights only.

Using the computer tools, teams led by Boeing and Lockheed Martin, and funded through a NASA Research Announcement, came up with designs for two small supersonic airliners that would carry between 30 and 80 passengers and potentially enter service in the 2025 timeframe.

"In bringing their design expertise to the process, these companies are not only addressing the low boom design elements, but all of the other aspects necessary for a realistic design," Coen said.

For example, the computer tools show that one way to reduce the perceived loudness of a supersonic jet's sonic boom is to change the aircraft shape, in part, by lengthening the aircraft's fuselage, making it much more slender. Theoretically, the noise issue could be solved by a really, really long aircraft body.

Unfortunately, while an 800-foot-long airliner may lead to publicly acceptable sonic booms, an aircraft that size still must fit at its gate, make turns while taxiing to the runway without hitting anything and generally not require an expensive redesign of the nation's airports.

"The long skinny fuselage is not a practical answer. In our pursuit of boom reductions, we examine the whole, three-dimensional shape of the vehicle including the engine configuration," Coen said. "Even then, we keep in mind that the airliner has to meet all of the other requirements which are part of good design practice."

To help reach their goals, the engineers relied on earlier studies that revealed how an aircraft's overall configuration could modify the shape of the supersonic shockwaves coming off the airplane so that the atmosphere then reduces the sharpness of the wave. By the time the shockwave reached the ground the shock would be removed, resulting in a nearly inaudible sonic boom.

"The booms are still there, but your ear is tricked into hearing a thump," Coen said.

Two other design considerations are important. The first reduces the size of the proposed commercial airliner so it carries fewer passengers and is lighter. The second slows the cruising speed. While the Concorde cruised at twice the speed of sound, or Mach 2.0, this airliner would cruise at a slightly slower Mach 1.6 to Mach 1.8.

"These design choices not only made both the sonic boom problem easier to tackle, but make the takeoff and landing noise problem much more solvable, much more amenable to solutions with the technologies we have in hand," Coen said.

So how loud was the Concorde and how does that relate to NASA's goals of making a quieter supersonic airplane?

The measurement NASA researchers are using to base their work on is called perceived decibel level, or PLdB. Like comparing apples and oranges, PLdB is a different flavor of decibels than the measurement (dBA) often quoted when discussing how loud, for example, a rock concert is compared to a kitchen blender or library reading room.

Concorde's sonic boom noise level was 105 PLdB. The PLdB that researchers believe will be acceptable for unrestricted supersonic flight over land is 75, but NASA wants to eventually beat that and reach 70 PLdB.

"For this phase of the research, we did succeed in reducing the perceived noise level. In fact, one of the designs reached as low as 79 PLdB," Coen said. "It was a really big step, but we still have some more work to do to reach our ultimate goal of about 70 PLdB."

Additional studies already are under way to keep whittling away at the supersonic noise challenge and come up with solutions that will be acceptable to regulatory agencies such as the Federal Aviation Administration, as well as airplane manufacturers, the airlines and the general public.

And while a commercial supersonic airliner flying from New York to Los Angeles over the U.S. heartland may be another decade or two away, Coen said it's very possible that smaller supersonic business jets could debut in the skies much sooner because lighter aircraft create weaker shock waves, which makes the low boom design challenge easier to solve.

"The business jet would probably be the first on the market, and that would help introduce some of the technologies that eventually would be used on the supersonic airliner. But such product decisions belong to others outside of NASA," Coen said. "Our job is to support the science and technology behind those choices, eventually making supersonic flight available to the traveling public."

Jim Banke
NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate

Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: Lillian Gipson
Aeronautics
Oct. 7, 2010

SonicBOBS: NASA Researching Reducing Intensity Of Sonic Booms

361373main_ED09-0148-02_full.jpg
A NASA F-18 dives toward a targeted area of Edwards AFB during a SonicBOBS calibration flight.
Credits: NASA / Tom Tschida
Although it may be music to the ears of aviation aficionados, the sudden and startling double-boom one hears when a nearby aircraft flies faster than the speed of sound can be a first-class annoyance to the uninitiated. So much so that most supersonic flight over land is prohibited in the United States and many other countries, except in controlled military testing airspace.
ed09-0148-12.jpg
Joseph Gavin of Gulfstream Aerospace and NASA co-op student Thomas Williams monitor sonic boom recording equipment placed in the Edwards Air Force Base Museum for the SonicBOBS calibration flights.
Credits: NASA / Tom Tschida
For several years, NASA has been researching means to reducing not only the strength of the shockwave produced when a high-performance aircraft exceeds the speed of sound, but also the perceived intensity of those shockwaves – or sonic booms – heard by persons on the ground. NASA Dryden's current Sonic Booms On Big Structures – or "SonicBOBS" – project is part of that effort.
NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center has planned a series of research flights by two F/A-18 aircraft on the mornings of Thursday, Oct 14 and Saturday, Oct 16, 2010 that will result in multiple sonic booms being heard in the local area of Edwards Air Force Base. The experiments will examine the structural response of large office buildings to low-amplitude sonic booms. Offsite visitors that are influential in the development of supersonic cruise vehicles will also experience these quieter sonic booms.
Worth noting is that the flights scheduled for Oct. 14 will be on the 63rd anniversary of the first manned supersonic flight flown by Air Force Capt. Chuck Yeager in the Bell X-1 rocket plane – and the first sonic booms over the high desert.
Portions of the flights by two NASA F/A-18 aircraft in restricted airspace over Edwards will be at supersonic speeds, and are expected to generate numerous sonic booms about two or three minutes apart during the tests. Perceived loudness of the booms will vary, and depend greatly on local atmospheric conditions, including temperature and wind profile, at the time of the flights. The flight profiles are designed to keep focused sonic booms away from surrounding communities.
The Sonic Booms On Big Structures – or SonicBOBS – study is a follow-on research to tests in 2006 that measured the perceived intensity of sonic booms on an old house, further tests in 2007 on a house of modern construction, both located in the base housing areas, and more recent tests in 2009 that instrumented the Consolidated Support Facility, the Edwards AFB Museum, and the Environmental Management Building.
For the current studies, the Consolidated Support Facility has again be instrumented with transducers to measure the momentary overpressure from sonic booms, ranging from inaudible to about 0.8 psf. The two F/A-18 aircraft will fly unique flight profiles in the high altitude supersonic corridor above the base at altitudes of 30,000 to 49,000 feet.
The first sonic booms on Oct. 14 will occur over a half-hour period beginning about 9:30 a.m. and focus on the Consolidated Support Facility building. The second series of flights on Oct. 16, scheduled on Saturday to minimize noise, are slated for about 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. The resulting sonic booms will be targeted on the sensors installed in and near the Consolidated Support Facility building.
Project officials have reserved Friday, Oct. 15 as a backup flight date if Thursday's flights cannot be completed on Oct. 14, and Saturday, Oct. 23 as a backup flight date for those scheduled for Oct. 16.
While potentially loud, these sonic booms should not cause any structural damage and Edwards' residents will only hear booms that are at or below levels normally heard on the base.
SonicBOBS is a joint effort of NASA's Langley Research and Dryden Flight Research Centers, with the cooperation of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Pennsylvania State University, and Seismic Warning Systems, Inc. The research is sponsored by the Supersonics Project of NASA's Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate.
› View Video
Gray Creech
NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: NASA Administrator
Aeronautics
July 2, 2010

Green Supersonic Machine

This future aircraft design concept for supersonic flight over land comes from the team led by the Lockheed Martin Corporation.
This future aircraft design concept for supersonic flight over land comes from the team led by the Lockheed Martin Corporation.

The team used simulation tools to show it was possible to achieve over-land flight by dramatically lowering the level of sonic booms through the use of an "inverted-V" engine-under wing configuration. Other revolutionary technologies help achieve range, payload and environmental goals.

This concept is one of two designs presented in April 2010 to the NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate for its NASA Research Announcement-funded studies into advanced supersonic cruise aircraft that could enter service in the 2030-2035 timeframe.

Read about all six teams' design concepts in the article, "Beauty of Future Airplanes is More than Skin Deep."

Image credit: NASA/Lockheed Martin Corporation
Last Updated: July 31, 2015
Editor: Lillian Gipson

No comments:

Post a Comment